Mar 22 2010

Legal ABC for stock photographers

Posted on: March 22, 2010 (70) Comments

Legal issues



are not the most exciting part of our job. However, a legal mess can completely ruin you or create major obstacles in your business




In this document I have collected all the legal information that I wish someone had whispered in my ear three years ago. Well now I know and consider me the person whispering it in your ear.



These days ten new microstock agencies appear each year and just as many disappear. The new guys will contact you and try to get you to send them your images, and this is where you need to be really careful. A serious agency will have their contracts and the legal side of things covered and will present you with a good contract. A sloppy agency will give you some google translated ukraine contract with ambiguous wording or say “that will come later”.


Here are the biggest pitfalls to watch for if you’re signing a contract:

No clear termination clause.
You should not sign a contract that does not promise you to be able to remove all your images from their site and subdistributors’ sites within a minimum of two years. This is the very longest you should sign a contract for and ideally you should negotiate this down to one year or less.  



Bad contract.
When you encounter a bad contract, walk away. A contract that you can’t make heads or tails of even after you’ve read it three times is not worth signing. If you’re really interested in joining the company, demand the contract be rewritten.



No signature back.
You sent them your hard copy, but did you ever get one back? Bad news: it won’t work if you didn’t.



Wrong entity, wrong name, wrong/misspelled company name.
Check the company name and the position of the person signing on behalf of the company. If not you might not be signing anything valid, but will act your part out because you don’t know this (before end up in court, that is).



Look at the jurisdiction:
Do you want to go to court in another country? Choose a jurisdiction that has a legislative history of cases in stock photography and licensing of media, copyright law. etc. The best jurisdictions are New York, Alberta, UK, Australia and New Zealand (We can thank Getty for this)



No user restrictions defined on the site.
This is really dangerous. Do not run the risk of letting an agency sell your images without user restriction that does not follow the stock industry standard. The industry standard for forbidden usage restricts resale or distribution of your image, restricts print runs over 250,000 (without special license) and forbids the use of an image alongside pornographic, defamatory or pharmaceutical or political content (i.e., images may not be used to promote tobacco products, adult entertainment, dating services, personal hygiene products, political endorsements, etc.).



No allowance for due diligence.
“Due diligence” is your right to check all the financial statements and finances of an agency to see if they are in fact keeping track of all sales and providing you with the right amount of money. If an agency does not allow this it is a really bad sign. You NEED this in the contract or you are making a deal with the devil.



Commission offer is too low.
If a new agency approached you then you should not go for anything below 40% commission. They will probably say…”well sorry, that is just too much,” and that’s okay. Wait another two months and they will warm up to the thought, and surprise, you will get yourself the contract.



Trying to squeeze in an submission minimum.
Some agencies have upload minimums or insist that you have to supply images every quarter etc.



Don’t say yes to this ever. Period.



Trying to squeeze in a “non-compete” agreement.
If they try to squeeze in a clause about you not being able to work with agencies or another of their already existing partners, this is a big no-no. A lot of contracts have this section and you should respond with a flat out “NO” to such agreements. If I signed a non-compete with a small agency and that agency had Getty as their partner, I could basically be sued for having my images on Istock.



No payment rules defined.
Payments must happen regularly, monthly or when requested. A contract needs a section about this so the agency cannot drag the payment process out forever. Also, your contract must contain clear terms on a sales statement reporting system.



Are there any dodgy subdistributors you need to know about?
Ask for a subdistributor list. The contract terms you are signing with the agency must be the same as the agency has with its subdistributors.



Who will do submissions, uploading and organizing into their collection?
How will they do this and how much effort is required by you? Get clear lines right away.



NDA
Some agencies will want you to sign a Non Disclosure Agreement, which basically states that you agree to not disclose (talk about) any of the confidential information you might have heard about the agency during the negotiations or contract formation. An NDA is ok, but it must be time limited and must go both ways. Make sure the confidentialinfo is defined.

Below is the standard autoreply I use when new agencies contact me. Feel free to use the same one yourself, or tweak it to make it your own. It is important to send a professional signal to new agencies and not to support legally messy agencies.

Dear agency XXX.
Thank you for showing interest in distributing my collection of images. My collection sells very well and I am sure we can mutually profit from a distribution agreement. When negotiating new contracts there are a couple of things we are looking for and that we would like you to clarify for us so we can move forward:

1. What is the commission offer you have in mind?
2. Will you do the submission and organization of our files on your site if we send you a hard drive, upload by FTP or other means, or are you looking to have us do that? Timeframe?
3. Please send us a copy of your contributor contract.
4. Please send us a copy of your user restrictions defined on the site.

Your contract must include the following:
1. A clear termination clause with a clear promise of complete removal
of all images within 2 years.
2. A allowance for due diligence.
3. Must not include a upload minimum or submission minimum.
4. Must contain a clearly defined payment structure and sales
statement reporting system.
5. A list of subdistributors if any.
6. A specified jurisdiction.

   

(70) Comments... What do you think? If you enjoyed this post, subscribe to my RSS
  1. István ZSÍROS said on March 22nd, 2010 at 5:56 pm  (Quote)

    Useful tips, thank you, Yuri!

  2. hurricane said on March 23rd, 2010 at 3:02 pm  (Quote)

    Very useful article. Thanks!

  3. Yuri Arcurs said on March 23rd, 2010 at 8:51 pm  (Quote)

    Alistair Cotton: Whatever happened to that “Stock Photographer’s Alliance” or “Union” idea from a few years back. It would be great if such a collective organisation would do all this homework on agencies first. Agency “black lists” or “white lists” could only really be drawn up by such an organisation.Suspect there is still a great need for such an organisation as an overall pressure group in the industry.

    Well. I have been thinking about this a little lately. I think the best thing we could do was a black-list kind of thing

  4. Jimmi Larsen said on April 15th, 2010 at 12:44 pm  (Quote)

    good article with useful material :)

  5. PhotoLogs said on April 20th, 2010 at 5:56 pm  (Quote)

    Thank you for legal ABC article!

  6. claudiaveja said on May 31st, 2010 at 10:41 pm  (Quote)

    Yuri Arcurs: Thank you. Perhaps a too nerdy post. Boring for the non-professional…

    Thank you for this…it’s so far away from boring. For me even a long detailed version would still be very much appreciated. Legal stuff are very important. So thank you again :)

  7. getty images representative philippines said on August 4th, 2010 at 4:30 am  (Quote)

    Very well said. Thanks for sharing us this article.

  8. Dave Lapham Photography said on August 9th, 2010 at 3:32 am  (Quote)

    Great article. Learned a ton!

    -cheers

  9. cheap stock images philippines said on August 11th, 2010 at 5:03 am  (Quote)

    Very great article, it helped me alot!

  10. Dubai-photographer said on August 23rd, 2010 at 11:13 pm  (Quote)

    Great article, love your work

  11. seema said on October 9th, 2010 at 11:43 am  (Quote)

    this is a great information

  12. Chris Mercer said on January 14th, 2011 at 11:34 pm  (Quote)

    Yuri Arcurs: Thank you. Perhaps a too nerdy post. Boring for the non-professional…from an amateur’s viewpoint, thank you for interesting and thought provoking information.

  13. Jaimie Dee - Atlanta Wedding Photographer said on January 20th, 2011 at 2:56 am  (Quote)

    Great advice!!! Thanks so much for posting!!! :)

  14. Jaimie Dee - Atlanta Wedding Photographer said on February 1st, 2011 at 12:43 am  (Quote)

    I could have sworn I’ve read this before! But great stuff!

  15. Joakim Abrahamsson said on May 1st, 2011 at 10:09 pm  (Quote)

    Thanks for sharing – great stuff.

  16. use said on August 8th, 2011 at 5:44 pm  (Quote)

    Good post, thanks for sharing. :)

  17. [...] stock photography information/opinion that could help those interested in the microstock world: Legal ABC for stock photographers | Yuri Arcurs Microstock Agencies – An Overview for Beginners | Yuri Arcurs What should I shoot and what [...]

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.