<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Found myself on Youtube! Warning: Possible waste of your time reading this.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arcurs.com/found-myself-on-youtube-warning-possible-waste-of-your-time-reading-this/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arcurs.com/found-myself-on-youtube-warning-possible-waste-of-your-time-reading-this</link>
	<description>a blog about selling your photos online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:52:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Kerman</title>
		<link>http://www.arcurs.com/found-myself-on-youtube-warning-possible-waste-of-your-time-reading-this/comment-page-1#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Kerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 04:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arcurs.com/?p=204#comment-252</guid>
		<description>Thanks for linking to my video (the first one &quot;why stock photography&quot;).  I was just supposed to be a dig on stock photography.  I just cringe every time I visit a website and it&#039;s so obvious they have used stock photos as some kind of front.  Similarly, it&#039;s amusing to see the same models pop up in completely different products--here&#039;s my favorite: http://www.theinquirer.net/en/inquirer/news/2005/08/18/does-oreilly-have-a-smelly-crotch  

I do believe there is a use for stock photos... hope you like the video (I have 60 other satire videos about various technologies... mostly Adobe products--see: http://www.youtube.com/user/phillipk )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for linking to my video (the first one &#8220;why stock photography&#8221;).  I was just supposed to be a dig on stock photography.  I just cringe every time I visit a website and it&#8217;s so obvious they have used stock photos as some kind of front.  Similarly, it&#8217;s amusing to see the same models pop up in completely different products&#8211;here&#8217;s my favorite: <a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/en/inquirer/news/2005/08/18/does-oreilly-have-a-smelly-crotch" rel="nofollow">http://www.theinquirer.net/en/inquirer/news/2005/08/18/does-oreilly-have-a-smelly-crotch</a>  </p>
<p>I do believe there is a use for stock photos&#8230; hope you like the video (I have 60 other satire videos about various technologies&#8230; mostly Adobe products&#8211;see: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/phillipk" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/user/phillipk</a> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

